Skip to content
Back to all categories

Browsers

Browsers and privacy extensions compared by how well they resist tracking and fingerprinting, and by what they send to their makers by default.

Last reviewed 路 15 entries

Your browser talks to more servers than almost any other program on your device. Every page load hands over your IP address, cookies and dozens of small details about your hardware and settings. Advertisers, data brokers and the sites themselves combine these into a profile that can follow you across the web, even after you clear your cookies.

No browser makes you anonymous on its own. The realistic goals are to stop sites from linking your visits together, to cut what the browser itself reports to its maker, and to look like many other users instead of one distinctive one. Hiding your IP address is a separate job for Tor or a trustworthy VPN.

ToolVerdictPlatforms
Tor BrowserRecommended
Mullvad BrowserRecommended
IronFoxRecommended
VanadiumRecommended
BraveUse with caution
LibreWolfUse with caution
HeliumUse with caution
ungoogled-chromiumUse with caution
CromiteUse with caution
FirefoxNot recommended
uBlock OriginRecommended
NoScriptRecommended
Privacy BadgerRecommended
AdNauseamUse with caution
ClearURLsUse with caution

How browsers track you

Web tracking relies on four main signals:

  • Cookies and site storage. Data a site, or a third party embedded in it, stores in your browser to recognise you later. Privacy-focused browsers partition third-party storage per site, but logins and first-party cookies still identify you.
  • Your IP address. Every server you contact sees it, and it is often enough to place you in a household or town. A browser setting cannot hide it; Tor or a VPN can.
  • Fingerprinting. Scripts read your screen and window size, time zone, language, installed fonts, graphics hardware and many other details. Combined, these are often unique enough to recognise your browser without storing anything on it, which is why clearing cookies does not help.
  • Accounts and sync. Signing in to the browser itself, for example with a Google or Microsoft account, links your browsing to an identity held by the vendor.

Fingerprinting matters more as cookie tracking gets harder. Since 16 February 2025, Google's advertising policies no longer prohibit advertisers from fingerprinting users; the UK data protection regulator called the change "irresponsible" (ICO statement).

Why blending in matters

There are two ways to resist fingerprinting. Uniformity, used by Tor Browser and Mullvad Browser, makes users report the same values wherever possible (a rounded window size, a standard font set, UTC as the time zone), so you hide in a crowd. Randomisation, used by Brave and some Chromium forks, feeds each site slightly different noise per session, so the values a tracker collects do not stay stable. Both work best when you leave the defaults alone.

Every change you make (an extra extension, a non-default setting, an unusual window size) can split you off from the crowd. A rare, heavily customised browser can stand out more than a common one with modest settings. This is why the browsers recommended below ask you not to customise them, and why piling extensions onto a normal browser often backfires.

Android and iOS

Why Chromium-based browsers are safer on Android

On Android the engine underneath matters for security. Chromium has the stronger sandbox, and Vanadium adds strict site isolation, which puts each site in its own sandboxed process. GrapheneOS's developers state that "Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android" and that Gecko-based browsers are more exposed to exploitation (GrapheneOS usage guide). Stock Firefox for Android still offers site isolation only as an opt-in Labs toggle, off by default as of version 155 (report, September 2026); IronFox enables it.

In practice: on GrapheneOS, use Vanadium for everyday browsing. On other Android phones there is no option without trade-offs: IronFox for privacy defaults, or a Chromium-based browser such as Brave or Cromite for stronger sandboxing (see their cons below). Use Tor Browser for Android when you need to hide your IP address. More on phone operating systems in the OS guide.

iPhone and iPad

There is no Tor Browser for iOS. The Tor Project points iPhone users to Onion Browser, which routes traffic over Tor, but says Apple's requirement that iOS browsers use the WebKit engine prevents it from offering the same protections as Tor Browser. If you need strong browser privacy, do that browsing on a desktop or an Android device.

Use with caution

Better than mainstream browsers, but each has a real gap: weaker or optional fingerprinting protection, slow or manual security updates, or bundled features you need to switch off.

Brave

Use with caution
Brave website (opens in a new tab)

Chromium-based browser with built-in ad and tracker blocking and fingerprint randomisation. Its privacy defaults are strong, but the free version bundles a crypto wallet, ads, an AI assistant and other commercial features.

Platform Support

WindowsmacOSLinuxAndroidiOSOpen source

Advantages

  • Randomises canvas, audio and other fingerprint values per site and session
  • Ad and tracker blocking (Shields) on by default
  • Still offers full uBlock Origin and NoScript, hosted by Brave
  • Chromium sandboxing on desktop and Android
  • Paid Brave Origin ($59.99 once, free on Linux) strips the extras

Drawbacks

  • Free version bundles Wallet, Rewards, Brave Ads, Leo AI, VPN and News
  • Has a daily usage ping and product analytics (P3A); check both in settings
  • Leo agent mode (opt-in, testing): Brave itself calls agentic browsing "inherently dangerous"
  • Full uBlock Origin depends on Brave keeping Manifest V2 alive in Chromium

LibreWolf

Use with caution
LibreWolf website (opens in a new tab)

Desktop Firefox fork that removes Mozilla's telemetry, includes uBlock Origin and turns on Firefox's resist-fingerprinting mode. A reasonable choice if you want Firefox without Mozilla's data collection and accept manual updates.

Platform Support

WindowsmacOSLinuxOpen source

Advantages

  • Aims to remove all telemetry, data collection and annoyances
  • uBlock Origin included
  • Resist Fingerprinting (RFP) enabled
  • Full Firefox extension support, including Manifest V2
  • Releases usually within three days of each Firefox release

Drawbacks

  • No built-in auto-update; relies on package managers or manual updates
  • Security fixes can trail Firefox by a few days
  • Distinct settings put you in a small group of LibreWolf users
  • Letterboxing off by default; strict defaults break some sites
  • Desktop only; small volunteer team

Helium

Use with caution
Helium website (opens in a new tab)

Young Chromium-based desktop browser that branched off ungoogled-chromium, with its own build of uBlock Origin and no analytics. It adds the automatic updates and easy extension installs that ungoogled-chromium lacks, but is still in beta.

Platform Support

WindowsmacOSLinuxOpen source

Advantages

  • Google service dependencies removed
  • Bundles a Helium-specific fork of uBlock Origin
  • No analytics; makes no web requests on first launch
  • Automatic updates on Windows and macOS
  • Adds noise to some web APIs to resist fingerprinting

Drawbacks

  • Beta software from a small team
  • Desktop only
  • Relies on Helium-run services (optional, self-hostable) for extension proxy, filter lists, updates
  • Fingerprinting protection is partial, by its own description

ungoogled-chromium

Use with caution
ungoogled-chromium website (opens in a new tab)

Chromium with Google web services and background requests removed. It changes little else, so it suits people who want plain Chromium without Google rather than a fingerprinting-resistant browser.

Platform Support

WindowsmacOSLinuxOpen source

Advantages

  • Removes Google-specific code and background requests
  • Blocks leftover requests to Google through domain substitution
  • Optional anti-fingerprinting flags (canvas and layout noise)
  • Available through Flathub, Homebrew, the AUR and other package sources

Drawbacks

  • No built-in auto-updates
  • No Chrome Web Store; extensions are installed manually
  • Anti-fingerprinting flags off by default, so you look like stock Chromium
  • Safe Browsing disabled, so no built-in malware or phishing warnings
  • Contributor binaries are not necessarily reproducible, so authenticity is not guaranteed

Cromite

Use with caution
Cromite website (opens in a new tab)

Chromium fork that continues Bromite, with built-in ad blocking and some anti-fingerprinting patches, for Android, Windows and Linux. Its developer says it is not suitable for journalists or people living under restrictive governments.

Updates slowed in 2026: version 148 shipped in May and version 153 on 15 September, while Chrome moved to a two-week release cycle. Check the date of the latest release before relying on it.

Platform Support

WindowsLinuxAndroidOpen source

Advantages

  • Built-in ad blocking
  • Some anti-fingerprinting mitigations
  • No Google services
  • Chromium sandboxing on Android
  • Auto-updater on Android

Drawbacks

  • Maintained mainly by one developer
  • Updates fell weeks behind Chromium security releases in 2026
  • Developer describes its fingerprinting mitigations as "not comprehensive"
  • No built-in auto-update on desktop; Windows needs a third-party launcher
  • Not intended for high-risk users, per its README

Extensions

Extensions can read and change every page you visit, so each one is a trust decision. Install as few as possible. In Tor Browser and Mullvad Browser, add none: the bundled ones are already configured, and anything extra makes you stand out.

Chrome no longer runs full uBlock Origin

Google has finished removing Manifest V2, the extension format that powerful content blockers rely on. Chrome 138 (July 2025) disabled Manifest V2 extensions, Chrome 139 removed support, and on 31 August 2026 all remaining Manifest V2 extensions, uBlock Origin among them, were taken off the Chrome Web Store (Google timeline, CyberInsider). Chrome users are left with uBlock Origin Lite, a less capable Manifest V3 version. Microsoft has started the same transition in Edge, showing deprecation warnings since September 2026 (Microsoft timeline). Firefox and its forks still run full uBlock Origin, and Brave hosts its own copies of uBlock Origin, NoScript, uMatrix and AdGuard.

Open-source content blocker for ads, trackers and malicious domains, with low resource use. If you add one extension to a normal browser, make it this one.

Platform Support

Browser extensionOpen source

Advantages

  • Blocks ads, trackers and known malicious domains
  • Efficient, with many optional filter lists
  • Can strip tracking parameters from links with the right filter list
  • Dynamic filtering gives per-site control in advanced mode
  • Works best on Firefox (CNAME uncloaking, HTML filtering)

Drawbacks

  • Full version no longer works in Chrome
  • uBlock Origin Lite for Chrome, Edge and Safari is less capable
  • Advanced features have a learning curve
  • Running several blockers at once causes conflicts

Blocks JavaScript and other active content except on sites you allow. Tor Browser and Mullvad Browser use it behind their security levels.

Platform Support

Browser extensionOpen source

Advantages

  • Blocks scripts on every site you have not allowed
  • Anti-XSS protection
  • Fine-grained per-site permissions
  • Available for Firefox (including Android) and Chromium-based browsers

Drawbacks

  • Breaks most sites until you allow them
  • Constant permission decisions; not beginner-friendly
  • A custom allow-list can make your browser more distinctive

EFF's tracker blocker. It ships with a pre-trained list of trackers, sends Global Privacy Control and Do Not Track signals, and needs no configuration.

Platform Support

Browser extensionOpen source

Advantages

  • Made by the EFF, a non-profit
  • Works without configuration
  • Click-to-activate replacements for embedded widgets
  • Removes tracking from Google and Facebook links
  • Available for Firefox, Chrome, Edge, Opera and Safari

Drawbacks

  • Largely overlaps with uBlock Origin
  • May not block all ads
  • Optional local learning can be abused to fingerprint you
  • Do not add it to Tor Browser or Mullvad Browser

AdNauseam

Use with caution
AdNauseam website (opens in a new tab)

Built on uBlock Origin, it blocks ads and then quietly clicks them in the background to fill ad-network profiles with noise. A protest and obfuscation tool more than a privacy tool; see data poisoning.

Platform Support

Browser extensionOpen source

Advantages

  • Includes uBlock Origin's blocking
  • Pollutes ad-tracking profiles with simulated clicks
  • Open source
  • Available for Firefox, Edge and Opera

Drawbacks

  • Removed from the Chrome Web Store in 2017
  • Relies on its maintainers to merge each uBlock Origin update
  • Simulated clicks generate extra traffic and may conflict with ad networks' terms
  • Does more work than uBlock Origin: it collects and visits ads
  • Its FAQ advises disabling other blockers while using it

ClearURLs

Use with caution
ClearURLs website (opens in a new tab)

Removes tracking parameters from links and blocks some other URL-based tracking. Still works on Firefox, but uBlock Origin's URL-tracking filter lists now cover most of the same ground.

Platform Support

Browser extensionOpen source

Advantages

  • Removes tracking parameters automatically
  • Blocks hyperlink auditing (ping tracking)
  • Prevents ETag tracking
  • Stops Google and Yandex from rewriting search result links
  • Context-menu entry to copy clean links

Drawbacks

  • No new release since version 1.27.3 (February 2025)
  • Disabled in Chrome and other browsers that dropped Manifest V2
  • Overlaps with uBlock Origin plus the AdGuard URL Tracking Protection list
  • Can break redirect-heavy sites

Practical tips

  • Choose by threat. Tor Browser when you need to hide who you are; Mullvad Browser with a VPN for private browsing without accounts on desktop; a hardened Firefox fork or Brave when you need logins and site compatibility.
  • Separate your identities. Use different browsers or profiles for logged-in accounts and for anonymous browsing, so cookies and fingerprints cannot link them. The alting guide covers running separate identities.
  • Delete cookies and site data when the browser closes, with exceptions only for the few sites you log into regularly.
  • Do not save passwords in the browser. Use a dedicated password manager instead.
  • Avoid signing in to the browser itself. Sync links your browsing to an account held by the vendor.
  • Check for WebRTC leaks. WebRTC can reveal your real IP address even behind a VPN (ungoogled-chromium FAQ). Test after connecting your VPN, and use encrypted DNS as well (DNS guide).
  • If you use Firefox, consider arkenfox. It is a maintained template of privacy settings. Read its wiki first: some settings break sites, and you need to understand what you are changing.
  • Leave Tor Browser and Mullvad Browser alone. Keep the default window size, do not add extensions, and use the preset security levels instead of individual tweaks, which can put you in a small "Custom" group.
  • Update promptly. Browser vulnerabilities are patched constantly. Browsers without auto-update (LibreWolf, ungoogled-chromium, Cromite on desktop) need you or your package manager to keep up.

Common mistakes

  • Treating private or incognito mode as anonymity. It only stops your own device from keeping history. Sites still see your IP address and fingerprint.
  • Installing many privacy extensions. Each one adds attack surface and makes your browser rarer. GrapheneOS's developers recommend against "piling on browser extensions and modifications" (source).
  • Customising Tor Browser or Mullvad Browser. Their protection depends on you looking like every other user.
  • Mixing identities in one browser. Logging into personal accounts in the same browser you use for anonymous research links the two, whatever VPN you use.
  • Handing sensitive browsing to an AI assistant. AI sidebars and agent modes, such as Firefox's Smart Window, Brave's Leo and Perplexity's Comet, can send page content to cloud models, and agents can be steered by instructions hidden in web pages. Brave's researchers showed such an attack against Comet in 2025 (Brave). Keep these features off for sensitive work; see the AI guide.

Further reading