Browsers and privacy extensions compared by how well they resist tracking and fingerprinting, and by what they send to their makers by default.
Last reviewed 路 15 entries
Your browser talks to more servers than almost any other program on your device. Every page load hands over your IP address, cookies and dozens of small details about your hardware and settings. Advertisers, data brokers and the sites themselves combine these into a profile that can follow you across the web, even after you clear your cookies.
No browser makes you anonymous on its own. The realistic goals are to stop sites from linking your visits together, to cut what the browser itself reports to its maker, and to look like many other users instead of one distinctive one. Hiding your IP address is a separate job for Tor or a trustworthy VPN.
Cookies and site storage. Data a site, or a third party embedded in it, stores in your browser to recognise you later. Privacy-focused browsers partition third-party storage per site, but logins and first-party cookies still identify you.
Your IP address. Every server you contact sees it, and it is often enough to place you in a household or town. A browser setting cannot hide it; Tor or a VPN can.
Fingerprinting. Scripts read your screen and window size, time zone, language, installed fonts, graphics hardware and many other details. Combined, these are often unique enough to recognise your browser without storing anything on it, which is why clearing cookies does not help.
Accounts and sync. Signing in to the browser itself, for example with a Google or Microsoft account, links your browsing to an identity held by the vendor.
Fingerprinting matters more as cookie tracking gets harder. Since 16 February 2025, Google's advertising policies no longer prohibit advertisers from fingerprinting users; the UK data protection regulator called the change "irresponsible" (ICO statement).
Why blending in matters
There are two ways to resist fingerprinting. Uniformity, used by Tor Browser and Mullvad Browser, makes users report the same values wherever possible (a rounded window size, a standard font set, UTC as the time zone), so you hide in a crowd. Randomisation, used by Brave and some Chromium forks, feeds each site slightly different noise per session, so the values a tracker collects do not stay stable. Both work best when you leave the defaults alone.
Every change you make (an extra extension, a non-default setting, an unusual window size) can split you off from the crowd. A rare, heavily customised browser can stand out more than a common one with modest settings. This is why the browsers recommended below ask you not to customise them, and why piling extensions onto a normal browser often backfires.
Firefox-based browser that sends all traffic through the Tor network and aims to make every user look the same. The strongest option when you need to hide your IP address and resist fingerprinting at the same time.
Platform Support
WindowsmacOSLinuxAndroidOpen source
Advantages
+Hides your IP address by routing traffic through three Tor relays
+Sorts users into a few large groups with identical fingerprints, plus letterboxing
+Isolates each site so third-party trackers cannot follow you between sites
+Preset security levels (Standard, Safer, Safest) disable risky web features
+Opens .onion sites
+AI and machine-learning components removed in version 15.0
Drawbacks
-Noticeably slower than a direct connection
-Some sites block Tor or show frequent CAPTCHAs
-Extensions and custom settings weaken its anti-fingerprinting
-No iOS version; on Android the Firefox engine is less sandboxed than Chromium
-Upcoming version 16 (in alpha) ends support for 32-bit x86 (Linux, Android) and Android 5 to 7
Tor Browser without the Tor network, developed by the Tor Project for Mullvad. It uses the same anti-fingerprinting design and is meant to be paired with a VPN you trust.
Platform Support
WindowsmacOSLinuxOpen source
Advantages
+Same uniform-fingerprint design as Tor Browser, including letterboxing
+Telemetry and crash reporting disabled at compile time
+Private browsing mode by default; history and cookies not kept
+uBlock Origin and NoScript preinstalled and preconfigured
+Faster than Tor Browser, since traffic does not go over Tor
+Works with any VPN, or none
Drawbacks
-Does not hide your IP address on its own
-Desktop only
-Adding extensions or changing defaults makes you stand out
-No saved history or logins between sessions, by design
Hardened Firefox fork for Android that continues the work of the Mull browser. It removes the tracking and Google libraries that stock Firefox for Android includes and ships with strict privacy defaults.
Platform Support
AndroidOpen source
Advantages
+Removes the Adjust, Sentry and Google Play libraries
+uBlock Origin bundled
+Site isolation (Fission) enabled, unlike stock Firefox for Android
+HTTPS-Only mode and DNS over HTTPS
+Tracks Firefox releases closely
Drawbacks
-Android only
-Small volunteer team
-Firefox engine on Android remains less sandboxed than Chromium
GrapheneOS's hardened version of Chromium, used as both the system browser and the WebView for other apps. One of the most strongly sandboxed browsers on Android, but only available on GrapheneOS.
Platform Support
AndroidOpen source
Advantages
+Strict site isolation and sandboxed iframes
+JavaScript JIT compiler off by default, with a per-site toggle
+Built-in content filtering with EasyList and EasyPrivacy
+Identical filter lists for all users, to avoid fingerprint differences
+Most private WebRTC setting by default
+No Google services
Drawbacks
-Only available on GrapheneOS
-No extension support, by design
-Content filtering less complete than uBlock Origin (no cosmetic filtering yet)
On Android the engine underneath matters for security. Chromium has the stronger sandbox, and Vanadium adds strict site isolation, which puts each site in its own sandboxed process. GrapheneOS's developers state that "Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android" and that Gecko-based browsers are more exposed to exploitation (GrapheneOS usage guide). Stock Firefox for Android still offers site isolation only as an opt-in Labs toggle, off by default as of version 155 (report, September 2026); IronFox enables it.
In practice: on GrapheneOS, use Vanadium for everyday browsing. On other Android phones there is no option without trade-offs: IronFox for privacy defaults, or a Chromium-based browser such as Brave or Cromite for stronger sandboxing (see their cons below). Use Tor Browser for Android when you need to hide your IP address. More on phone operating systems in the OS guide.
iPhone and iPad
There is no Tor Browser for iOS. The Tor Project points iPhone users to Onion Browser, which routes traffic over Tor, but says Apple's requirement that iOS browsers use the WebKit engine prevents it from offering the same protections as Tor Browser. If you need strong browser privacy, do that browsing on a desktop or an Android device.
Better than mainstream browsers, but each has a real gap: weaker or optional fingerprinting protection, slow or manual security updates, or bundled features you need to switch off.
Chromium-based browser with built-in ad and tracker blocking and fingerprint randomisation. Its privacy defaults are strong, but the free version bundles a crypto wallet, ads, an AI assistant and other commercial features.
Platform Support
WindowsmacOSLinuxAndroidiOSOpen source
Advantages
+Randomises canvas, audio and other fingerprint values per site and session
+Ad and tracker blocking (Shields) on by default
+Still offers full uBlock Origin and NoScript, hosted by Brave
+Chromium sandboxing on desktop and Android
+Paid Brave Origin ($59.99 once, free on Linux) strips the extras
Drawbacks
-Free version bundles Wallet, Rewards, Brave Ads, Leo AI, VPN and News
-Has a daily usage ping and product analytics (P3A); check both in settings
Desktop Firefox fork that removes Mozilla's telemetry, includes uBlock Origin and turns on Firefox's resist-fingerprinting mode. A reasonable choice if you want Firefox without Mozilla's data collection and accept manual updates.
Platform Support
WindowsmacOSLinuxOpen source
Advantages
+Aims to remove all telemetry, data collection and annoyances
+uBlock Origin included
+Resist Fingerprinting (RFP) enabled
+Full Firefox extension support, including Manifest V2
+Releases usually within three days of each Firefox release
Drawbacks
-No built-in auto-update; relies on package managers or manual updates
-Security fixes can trail Firefox by a few days
-Distinct settings put you in a small group of LibreWolf users
-Letterboxing off by default; strict defaults break some sites
Young Chromium-based desktop browser that branched off ungoogled-chromium, with its own build of uBlock Origin and no analytics. It adds the automatic updates and easy extension installs that ungoogled-chromium lacks, but is still in beta.
Platform Support
WindowsmacOSLinuxOpen source
Advantages
+Google service dependencies removed
+Bundles a Helium-specific fork of uBlock Origin
+No analytics; makes no web requests on first launch
+Automatic updates on Windows and macOS
+Adds noise to some web APIs to resist fingerprinting
Drawbacks
-Beta software from a small team
-Desktop only
-Relies on Helium-run services (optional, self-hostable) for extension proxy, filter lists, updates
-Fingerprinting protection is partial, by its own description
Chromium with Google web services and background requests removed. It changes little else, so it suits people who want plain Chromium without Google rather than a fingerprinting-resistant browser.
Platform Support
WindowsmacOSLinuxOpen source
Advantages
+Removes Google-specific code and background requests
+Blocks leftover requests to Google through domain substitution
+Optional anti-fingerprinting flags (canvas and layout noise)
+Available through Flathub, Homebrew, the AUR and other package sources
Drawbacks
-No built-in auto-updates
-No Chrome Web Store; extensions are installed manually
-Anti-fingerprinting flags off by default, so you look like stock Chromium
-Safe Browsing disabled, so no built-in malware or phishing warnings
-Contributor binaries are not necessarily reproducible, so authenticity is not guaranteed
Chromium fork that continues Bromite, with built-in ad blocking and some anti-fingerprinting patches, for Android, Windows and Linux. Its developer says it is not suitable for journalists or people living under restrictive governments.
Updates slowed in 2026: version 148 shipped in May and version 153 on 15 September, while Chrome moved to a two-week release cycle. Check the date of the latest release before relying on it.
Platform Support
WindowsLinuxAndroidOpen source
Advantages
+Built-in ad blocking
+Some anti-fingerprinting mitigations
+No Google services
+Chromium sandboxing on Android
+Auto-updater on Android
Drawbacks
-Maintained mainly by one developer
-Updates fell weeks behind Chromium security releases in 2026
-Developer describes its fingerprinting mitigations as "not comprehensive"
-No built-in auto-update on desktop; Windows needs a third-party launcher
Stock Firefox is listed here because of what it collects and promotes by default. Its engine is the base of Tor Browser, Mullvad Browser, LibreWolf and IronFox, which remove most of these issues, and it can be hardened (see practical tips).
Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge are not covered in detail. Both come from companies with large advertising businesses, encourage signing in with a Google or Microsoft account, and have dropped (Chrome) or are dropping (Edge) the extension format that full uBlock Origin needs.
Mozilla's browser. Out of the box it sends usage data to Mozilla, shows sponsored content and adds AI features, and since 2025 Mozilla no longer promises that it never sells user data. It needs significant hardening to fit this guide.
February 2025: alongside new Terms of Use, Mozilla removed the FAQ statement that it never sells user data. It said some jurisdictions define "sale" broadly and that it does not sell data in the way most people understand the term.
Platform Support
WindowsmacOSLinuxAndroidiOSOpen source
Advantages
+Open source, independent Gecko engine
+Best platform for full uBlock Origin; Manifest V2 still supported
+Can be hardened with arkenfox or manual settings
+Stronger fingerprinting protection in Private Browsing and ETP Strict (Firefox 145)
+One setting blocks all current and future AI features (Firefox 148 and later)
Drawbacks
-Sends technical and interaction data and a daily usage ping unless you opt out
-Sponsored New Tab content and, in some regions, sponsored suggestions unless turned off
-2025 policy update dropped the promise never to sell user data
-Expanding AI features, including an opt-in Smart Window that uses third-party models
Extensions can read and change every page you visit, so each one is a trust decision. Install as few as possible. In Tor Browser and Mullvad Browser, add none: the bundled ones are already configured, and anything extra makes you stand out.
Chrome no longer runs full uBlock Origin
Google has finished removing Manifest V2, the extension format that powerful content blockers rely on. Chrome 138 (July 2025) disabled Manifest V2 extensions, Chrome 139 removed support, and on 31 August 2026 all remaining Manifest V2 extensions, uBlock Origin among them, were taken off the Chrome Web Store (Google timeline, CyberInsider). Chrome users are left with uBlock Origin Lite, a less capable Manifest V3 version. Microsoft has started the same transition in Edge, showing deprecation warnings since September 2026 (Microsoft timeline). Firefox and its forks still run full uBlock Origin, and Brave hosts its own copies of uBlock Origin, NoScript, uMatrix and AdGuard.
Open-source content blocker for ads, trackers and malicious domains, with low resource use. If you add one extension to a normal browser, make it this one.
Platform Support
Browser extensionOpen source
Advantages
+Blocks ads, trackers and known malicious domains
+Efficient, with many optional filter lists
+Can strip tracking parameters from links with the right filter list
+Dynamic filtering gives per-site control in advanced mode
+Works best on Firefox (CNAME uncloaking, HTML filtering)
Drawbacks
-Full version no longer works in Chrome
-uBlock Origin Lite for Chrome, Edge and Safari is less capable
-Advanced features have a learning curve
-Running several blockers at once causes conflicts
EFF's tracker blocker. It ships with a pre-trained list of trackers, sends Global Privacy Control and Do Not Track signals, and needs no configuration.
Platform Support
Browser extensionOpen source
Advantages
+Made by the EFF, a non-profit
+Works without configuration
+Click-to-activate replacements for embedded widgets
+Removes tracking from Google and Facebook links
+Available for Firefox, Chrome, Edge, Opera and Safari
Drawbacks
-Largely overlaps with uBlock Origin
-May not block all ads
-Optional local learning can be abused to fingerprint you
Built on uBlock Origin, it blocks ads and then quietly clicks them in the background to fill ad-network profiles with noise. A protest and obfuscation tool more than a privacy tool; see data poisoning.
Platform Support
Browser extensionOpen source
Advantages
+Includes uBlock Origin's blocking
+Pollutes ad-tracking profiles with simulated clicks
+Open source
+Available for Firefox, Edge and Opera
Drawbacks
-Removed from the Chrome Web Store in 2017
-Relies on its maintainers to merge each uBlock Origin update
-Simulated clicks generate extra traffic and may conflict with ad networks' terms
-Does more work than uBlock Origin: it collects and visits ads
-Its FAQ advises disabling other blockers while using it
Removes tracking parameters from links and blocks some other URL-based tracking. Still works on Firefox, but uBlock Origin's URL-tracking filter lists now cover most of the same ground.
Platform Support
Browser extensionOpen source
Advantages
+Removes tracking parameters automatically
+Blocks hyperlink auditing (ping tracking)
+Prevents ETag tracking
+Stops Google and Yandex from rewriting search result links
+Context-menu entry to copy clean links
Drawbacks
-No new release since version 1.27.3 (February 2025)
-Disabled in Chrome and other browsers that dropped Manifest V2
-Overlaps with uBlock Origin plus the AdGuard URL Tracking Protection list
Choose by threat. Tor Browser when you need to hide who you are; Mullvad Browser with a VPN for private browsing without accounts on desktop; a hardened Firefox fork or Brave when you need logins and site compatibility.
Separate your identities. Use different browsers or profiles for logged-in accounts and for anonymous browsing, so cookies and fingerprints cannot link them. The alting guide covers running separate identities.
Delete cookies and site data when the browser closes, with exceptions only for the few sites you log into regularly.
Do not save passwords in the browser. Use a dedicated password manager instead.
Avoid signing in to the browser itself. Sync links your browsing to an account held by the vendor.
Check for WebRTC leaks. WebRTC can reveal your real IP address even behind a VPN (ungoogled-chromium FAQ). Test after connecting your VPN, and use encrypted DNS as well (DNS guide).
If you use Firefox, consider arkenfox. It is a maintained template of privacy settings. Read its wiki first: some settings break sites, and you need to understand what you are changing.
Leave Tor Browser and Mullvad Browser alone. Keep the default window size, do not add extensions, and use the preset security levels instead of individual tweaks, which can put you in a small "Custom" group.
Update promptly. Browser vulnerabilities are patched constantly. Browsers without auto-update (LibreWolf, ungoogled-chromium, Cromite on desktop) need you or your package manager to keep up.
Treating private or incognito mode as anonymity. It only stops your own device from keeping history. Sites still see your IP address and fingerprint.
Installing many privacy extensions. Each one adds attack surface and makes your browser rarer. GrapheneOS's developers recommend against "piling on browser extensions and modifications" (source).
Customising Tor Browser or Mullvad Browser. Their protection depends on you looking like every other user.
Mixing identities in one browser. Logging into personal accounts in the same browser you use for anonymous research links the two, whatever VPN you use.
Handing sensitive browsing to an AI assistant. AI sidebars and agent modes, such as Firefox's Smart Window, Brave's Leo and Perplexity's Comet, can send page content to cloud models, and agents can be steered by instructions hidden in web pages. Brave's researchers showed such an attack against Comet in 2025 (Brave). Keep these features off for sensitive work; see the AI guide.